CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/jnhUnsat/
normalized-jnh14_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/jnhUnsat/
normalized-jnh14_ext.xml
MD5SUMe71eef1218a265275269785d5b38e5ef
Bench CategoryN-ARY-EXT (n-ary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.034994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints849
Maximum constraint arity11
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension849
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131065844UNSAT 0.034994 0.0349299
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271065834UNSAT 0.038993 0.0473379
Mistral-option 1.3141065843UNSAT 0.040992 0.046284
cpHydra k_401065850UNSAT 0.043992 0.0480551
cpHydra k_101065849UNSAT 0.047991 0.054383
casper zito1065846UNSAT 0.047992 0.0513499
casper zao1065845UNSAT 0.083986 0.0910891
spider 2008-06-141065832UNSAT 0.180972 0.204621
MDG-probe 2008-06-271065833UNSAT 0.200968 0.202647
bpsolver 2008-06-271065838UNSAT 0.339947 0.361438
mddc-solv 2008-06-091065831UNSAT 0.733887 0.744978
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301065830UNSAT 0.766883 0.634499
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041105810UNSAT 0.840871 0.876351
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261065840UNSAT 1.02184 1.05452
Sugar v1.13+minisat1065837UNSAT 1.03384 1.17852
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261065839UNSAT 1.04084 1.10573
Sugar v1.13+picosat1065836UNSAT 1.16382 1.3035
Abscon 112v4 AC1065847UNSAT 1.21981 1.25194
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1065848UNSAT 1.40179 1.44072
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131065835UNSAT 1.72974 1.35621
galac E1065842UNSAT 4.15737 4.0337
galac M1065841UNSAT 5.21621 5.61454
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301065828? (TO) 1800.06 1816.22
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301065829? (TO) 1800.08 1814.42

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: