CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-ooo-rf10.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-ooo-rf10.xml
MD5SUMbdc9dae3766ae8d08071d7aa1b585934
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark59.254
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables18069
Number of constraints52474
Maximum constraint arity11
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension52474
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1064946UNSAT 59.254 59.9341
Sugar v1.13+picosat1064945UNSAT 64.0583 64.7278
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131064944UNSAT 598.623 598.434
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301064939? 1556.28 1564.19
cpHydra k_401064959? (TO) 1800.03 1817.73
cpHydra k_101064958? (TO) 1800.05 1808.13
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301064940? (TO) 1800.06 1802.22
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271064943? (TO) 1800.06 1827.13
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106570? (TO) 1800.06 1806.82
Mistral-prime 1.3131064953? (TO) 1800.06 1813.12
bpsolver 2008-06-271064947? (TO) 1800.07 1802.72
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301064941? (TO) 1800.07 1810.53
Mistral-option 1.3141064952? (TO) 1800.08 1813.82
casper zito1064955? (TO) 1800.08 1805.92
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261064949? (TO) 1800.11 1808.08
casper zao1064954? (TO) 1800.11 1804.32
MDG-probe 2008-06-271064942? (TO) 1800.12 1803.42
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261064948? (TO) 1800.14 1813.58
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1064957? (TO) 1800.15 1816.18
Abscon 112v4 AC1064956? (TO) 1800.18 1816.39
galac E1064951Wrong Cert. 468.035 470.356
galac M1064950Wrong Cert. 499.765 505.981

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: