CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-cache-ibm-q-unbounded-Icl2arity-ucl.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/uclid/
normalized-cache-ibm-q-unbounded-Icl2arity-ucl.xml
MD5SUM9d4795f9e32ba7017720fe7b897ab8b7
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark140.591
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables23837
Number of constraints67567
Maximum constraint arity13
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension67567
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sugar v1.13+minisat1064820UNSAT 140.591 142.558
Sugar v1.13+picosat1064819UNSAT 253.6 257.332
galac M1064824UNSAT 519.142 523.423
galac E1064825UNSAT 533.29 534.672
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131064818? 399.397 400.442
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301064813? 1174.03 1183.03
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301064814? 1191.08 1197.06
cpHydra k_401064833? (TO) 1800 1810.13
cpHydra k_101064832? (TO) 1800.02 1808.73
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271064817? (TO) 1800.03 1803.84
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106564? (TO) 1800.04 1810.42
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301064815? (TO) 1800.05 1804.72
Mistral-prime 1.3131064827? (TO) 1800.06 1810.33
MDG-probe 2008-06-271064816? (TO) 1800.07 1809.64
bpsolver 2008-06-271064821? (TO) 1800.07 1812.23
casper zito1064829? (TO) 1800.08 1802.72
casper zao1064828? (TO) 1800.09 1814.12
Mistral-option 1.3141064826? (TO) 1800.11 1801.74
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1064831? (TO) 1800.13 1805.47
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261064822? (TO) 1800.16 1807.74
Abscon 112v4 AC1064830? (TO) 1800.16 1809.02
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261064823? (TO) 1800.2 1800.9

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: