CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/
primesDimacs/normalized-g-125-18.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/
primesDimacs/normalized-g-125-18.xml
MD5SUM22689bcc3124eea2b7d80bb2193e6792
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables4500
Number of constraints72413
Maximum constraint arity18
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension72413
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
galac M1050236? (TO) 1800.02 1805.12
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301050226? (TO) 1800.03 1812.32
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104883? (TO) 1800.03 1814.11
casper zito1050241? (TO) 1800.03 1817.12
Mistral-option 1.3141050238? (TO) 1800.03 1802.02
bpsolver 2008-06-271050233? (TO) 1800.04 1812.62
cpHydra k_101050244? (TO) 1800.05 1813.43
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301050227? (TO) 1800.06 1802.22
cpHydra k_401050245? (TO) 1800.06 1803.13
Sugar v1.13+picosat1050231? (TO) 1800.06 1818.43
MDG-probe 2008-06-271050228? (TO) 1800.06 1807.52
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301050225? (TO) 1800.07 1808.92
Sugar v1.13+minisat1050232? (TO) 1800.07 1806.74
galac E1050237? (TO) 1800.09 1815.02
Abscon 112v4 AC1050242? (TO) 1800.09 1803.36
Mistral-prime 1.3131050239? (TO) 1800.1 1810.52
casper zao1050240? (TO) 1800.11 1803.42
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271050229? (TO) 1800.12 1807.72
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1050243? (TO) 1800.13 1818.18
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261050234? (TO) 1800.15 1812.28
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131050230? (TO) 1800.16 1804.89
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261050235? (TO) 1800.17 1802.31

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: