CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/mpsReduced/
normalized-mps-red-bandm.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/mpsReduced/
normalized-mps-red-bandm.xml
MD5SUM2e689f8063f4b75fb1edd7df8c8edad7
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark21.1048
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables14160
Number of constraints610
Maximum constraint arity2100
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension610
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271063645UNSAT 21.1048 21.1125
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271063641UNSAT 50.6853 50.9256
Mistral-prime 1.3131063651UNSAT 51.6931 51.9622
Mistral-option 1.3141063650UNSAT 68.5446 68.774
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261063646UNSAT 101.17 101.662
cpHydra k_101063656UNSAT 108.4 109.598
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261063647UNSAT 114.31 115.451
MDG-probe 2008-06-271063640UNSAT 632.021 636.383
cpHydra k_401063657UNSAT 1468.6 1484.94
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301063638? 0.71689 0.739276
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301063639? 0.869867 0.914255
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301063637? 0.948854 1.0721
Sugar v1.13+picosat1063643? 430.444 456.498
Sugar v1.13+minisat1063644? 449.466 477.597
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106507? (exit code) 104.874 105.966
galac M1063648? (TO) 1800 1801.73
galac E1063649? (TO) 1800.04 1806.72
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131063642? (TO) 1800.08 1804.47
Abscon 112v4 AC1063654? (TO) 1800.21 1801.63
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1063655? (TO) 1800.22 1801.35
casper zao1063652Signal 14.0179 37.0711
casper zito1063653Signal 14.0189 35.5405

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: