CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/pseudo/mpsReduced/
normalized-mps-red-share2b.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/pseudo/mpsReduced/
normalized-mps-red-share2b.xml
MD5SUM8a721fe409f930a696bbe0a3be39d00f
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark12.6901
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables2370
Number of constraints109
Maximum constraint arity360
Maximum domain size2
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension109
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261063395UNSAT 9.8775 9.90018
Mistral-option 1.3141063398UNSAT 12.6901 12.7982
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261063394UNSAT 13.7749 13.918
Mistral-prime 1.3131063399UNSAT 27.0369 27.1562
cpHydra k_101063404UNSAT 37.9982 38.5077
MDG-probe 2008-06-271063388UNSAT 148.885 154.653
casper zao1063400UNSAT 333.675 339.064
casper zito1063401UNSAT 402.188 404.244
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106524UNSAT 747.321 753.255
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271063389UNSAT 1007.41 1015.2
cpHydra k_401063405UNSAT 1280.38 1289.68
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131063390? 408.482 408.434
Sugar v1.13+minisat1063392? (MO) 157.134 166.115
galac M1063396? (MO) 207.82 209.933
galac E1063397? (MO) 210.33 215.139
Sugar v1.13+picosat1063391? (MO) 355.992 364.579
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301063386? (TO) 1800.02 1802.02
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301063387? (TO) 1800.08 1805.72
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1063403? (TO) 1800.09 1802.66
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301063385? (TO) 1800.09 1801.83
bpsolver 2008-06-271063393? (TO) 1800.11 1816.31
Abscon 112v4 AC1063402? (TO) 1800.14 1826.68

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: