CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/schurrLemma/
normalized-lemma-50-9-mod.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/schurrLemma/
normalized-lemma-50-9-mod.xml
MD5SUM4312a5e57186bf6bd2a848a5a1f0f4ee
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.043993
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables50
Number of constraints600
Maximum constraint arity3
Maximum domain size9
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension600
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131047931UNSAT 0.043993 0.0576829
MDG-probe 2008-06-271047920UNSAT 0.045992 0.0538041
Mistral-option 1.3141047930UNSAT 0.046992 0.0540101
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271047921UNSAT 0.048991 0.053865
cpHydra k_101047936UNSAT 0.058991 0.0662241
cpHydra k_401047937UNSAT 0.05999 0.07199
bpsolver 2008-06-271047925UNSAT 0.170973 0.175916
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261047926UNSAT 1.9757 2.09949
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261047927UNSAT 2.12268 2.15371
Sugar v1.13+minisat1047924UNSAT 3.04054 3.15582
Sugar v1.13+picosat1047923UNSAT 6.16806 6.38058
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104805UNSAT 15.4377 15.6497
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301047919UNSAT 448.819 453.193
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1047935UNSAT 460.925 461.182
Abscon 112v4 AC1047934UNSAT 493.224 497.492
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131047922UNSAT 534.629 536.998
galac M1047928UNSAT 608.924 614.785
galac E1047929UNSAT 808.924 816.652
casper zito1047933UNSAT 856.879 864.323
casper zao1047932UNSAT 869.283 872.694
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301047918? (TO) 1800.01 1817.72
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301047917? (TO) 1800.04 1801.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: