CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-9.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/radar-9-28-4-2/
normalized-radar-9-28-4-2-9.xml
MD5SUM36e1d8944ebd37a8cc45f34f81459e05
Bench CategoryN-ARY-INT (n-ary constraints in intension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.063989
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables168
Number of constraints81
Maximum constraint arity21
Maximum domain size5
Number of constraints which are defined in extension0
Number of constraints which are defined in intension81
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271057713UNSAT 0.063989 0.068558
Mistral-prime 1.3131057723UNSAT 0.063989 0.0693951
Mistral-option 1.3141057722UNSAT 0.065989 0.0707371
MDG-probe 2008-06-271057712UNSAT 0.066989 0.122048
cpHydra k_401057729UNSAT 0.071989 0.0809399
cpHydra k_101057728UNSAT 0.074987 0.0815609
bpsolver 2008-06-271057717UNSAT 0.12398 0.136078
casper zito1057725UNSAT 0.970851 0.988007
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261057718UNSAT 1.08483 1.10451
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261057719UNSAT 1.14782 1.20924
Sugar v1.13+minisat1057716UNSAT 1.63075 1.74622
Sugar v1.13+picosat1057715UNSAT 1.84072 2.07913
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1057727UNSAT 2.50562 2.55507
Abscon 112v4 AC1057726UNSAT 2.51262 2.56701
casper zao1057724UNSAT 3.9354 3.95768
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301057711UNSAT 123.445 124.753
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301057709UNSAT 201.341 203.109
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301057710UNSAT 202.247 204.198
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041106657? 0.357944 0.36878
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131057714? 269.642 268.879
galac E1057721? (problem) 71.3092 71.7169
galac M1057720? (problem) 71.8591 72.5876

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: