CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-10_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-10_ext.xml
MD5SUMd92132c0782cae99c8a071ae22148d4e
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.036994
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints822
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension822
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271039555UNSAT 0.036994 0.0426461
Mistral-option 1.3141039564UNSAT 0.046992 0.0534411
casper zito1043729UNSAT 0.073988 0.079776
casper zao1043100UNSAT 0.151976 0.157369
MDG-probe 2008-06-271039554UNSAT 0.165973 0.166697
spider 2008-06-141039551UNSAT 0.313951 0.320643
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261039561UNSAT 0.620904 0.675055
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301039550UNSAT 0.735887 0.781601
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104428UNSAT 0.799878 0.850975
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261039560UNSAT 0.837871 0.896772
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044987UNSAT 0.928858 0.938838
Abscon 112v4 AC1044358UNSAT 1.00185 1.05552
galac E1039563UNSAT 1.01284 1.0669
galac M1039562UNSAT 1.12483 1.15081
Sugar v1.13+minisat1039558UNSAT 1.14282 1.18951
Sugar v1.13+picosat1039557UNSAT 1.35479 1.445
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131039556UNSAT 1.57376 1.61505
Mistral-prime 1.3131039565UNSAT 6.78097 6.85101
cpHydra k_101045616UNSAT 8.06477 8.21275
cpHydra k_401046245UNSAT 14.3528 14.6435
bpsolver 2008-06-271039559UNSAT 91.6641 92.0217
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301039548? (TO) 1800.07 1813.62
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301039549? (TO) 1800.1 1807.92

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: