CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-11_ext.xml
MD5SUM2ea4537f3cfa2316558a875189215d8d
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.041993
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints822
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension822
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141039474UNSAT 0.041993 0.0485811
casper zito1043724UNSAT 0.047991 0.054487
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271039465UNSAT 0.050992 0.0598681
Mistral-prime 1.3131039475UNSAT 0.06099 0.067043
cpHydra k_101045611UNSAT 0.074988 0.0816521
cpHydra k_401046240UNSAT 0.075987 0.0862109
casper zao1043095UNSAT 0.075987 0.0828311
MDG-probe 2008-06-271039464UNSAT 0.164974 0.173594
spider 2008-06-141039461UNSAT 0.568913 0.580142
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261039471UNSAT 0.603907 0.630096
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261039470UNSAT 0.614905 0.625988
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104423UNSAT 0.692893 0.583123
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301039460UNSAT 0.693893 0.74545
Sugar v1.13+minisat1039468UNSAT 0.986849 1.07309
Abscon 112v4 AC1044353UNSAT 1.06784 1.09332
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044982UNSAT 1.10383 1.16359
galac M1039472UNSAT 1.13383 1.16306
galac E1039473UNSAT 1.23481 1.2683
Sugar v1.13+picosat1039467UNSAT 1.3308 1.41814
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131039466UNSAT 1.43078 1.49471
bpsolver 2008-06-271039469UNSAT 109.178 110.112
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301039459? (TO) 1800.04 1800.92
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301039458? (TO) 1800.07 1800.82

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: