CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-14_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-10/
normalized-qcp-10-67-14_ext.xml
MD5SUM622f0167f8b2d520cab49e33ee1a53b4
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.021996
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables100
Number of constraints822
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size10
Number of constraints which are defined in extension822
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131039421UNSAT 0.021996 0.030272
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271039411UNSAT 0.023995 0.031522
Mistral-option 1.3141039420UNSAT 0.028995 0.03582
cpHydra k_401046237UNSAT 0.034993 0.0433759
cpHydra k_101045608UNSAT 0.035993 0.0421491
casper zito1043721UNSAT 0.044992 0.051789
spider 2008-06-141039407UNSAT 0.060989 0.0684011
casper zao1043092UNSAT 0.071988 0.0799399
MDG-probe 2008-06-271039410UNSAT 0.143977 0.150475
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261039417UNSAT 0.608906 0.622804
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301039406UNSAT 0.616905 0.633678
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261039416UNSAT 0.659898 0.686805
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104420UNSAT 0.673897 0.727465
Abscon 112v4 AC1044350UNSAT 0.866867 0.886939
Sugar v1.13+minisat1039414UNSAT 0.937857 1.03857
galac E1039419UNSAT 0.998847 1.0585
Sugar v1.13+picosat1039413UNSAT 1.02684 1.11958
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044979UNSAT 1.03584 1.10347
galac M1039418UNSAT 1.13083 1.15835
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131039412UNSAT 1.39479 1.45274
bpsolver 2008-06-271039415UNSAT 2.75858 2.78552
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301039405? (TO) 1800.01 1817.02
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301039404? (TO) 1800.07 1803.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: