CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/coloring/
normalized-le-450-5a-4-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/coloring/
normalized-le-450-5a-4-ext.xml
MD5SUM1b9f42e73c63b23822cbfeaa1a420be1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.149977
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables450
Number of constraints5714
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size4
Number of constraints which are defined in extension5714
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141038430UNSAT 0.149977 0.150852
Mistral-prime 1.3131038431UNSAT 0.164974 0.173232
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038421UNSAT 0.165973 0.172199
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038420UNSAT 0.166973 0.17373
cpHydra k_401046182UNSAT 0.167973 0.174789
cpHydra k_101045553UNSAT 0.172972 0.179414
casper zito1043666UNSAT 0.430934 0.43565
bpsolver 2008-06-271038425UNSAT 0.623904 0.641316
spider 2008-06-141038417UNSAT 0.630903 0.645248
casper zao1043037UNSAT 1.01784 1.03185
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038426UNSAT 1.06284 1.10923
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038427UNSAT 1.10183 1.1586
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044924UNSAT 1.52777 1.56895
Abscon 112v4 AC1044295UNSAT 1.55276 1.62719
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104365UNSAT 1.60776 1.64741
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038424UNSAT 1.88671 1.97593
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038423UNSAT 2.08468 2.24
galac M1038428UNSAT 2.14767 2.2094
galac E1038429UNSAT 2.28665 2.37043
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038422UNSAT 3.68644 3.74275
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038416UNSAT 6.67198 6.77142
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038415? (TO) 1800.02 1810.53
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038414? (TO) 1800.04 1806.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: