CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-25/
normalized-qcp-25-264-11_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-25/
normalized-qcp-25-264-11_ext.xml
MD5SUM4e0a4a07c28ced9909e8a26fd94d990f
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.355945
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables625
Number of constraints10142
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size25
Number of constraints which are defined in extension10142
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131038161UNSAT 0.355945 0.356757
cpHydra k_101045538UNSAT 0.382941 0.387717
cpHydra k_401046167UNSAT 0.38394 0.387383
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271038151UNSAT 0.401938 0.406775
MDG-probe 2008-06-271038150UNSAT 0.614906 0.62039
Mistral-option 1.3141038160UNSAT 0.710891 0.718295
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261038157UNSAT 1.16282 1.20185
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261038156UNSAT 1.17682 1.20543
Abscon 112v4 AC1044280UNSAT 1.82772 1.89838
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044909UNSAT 1.83572 1.89606
spider 2008-06-141038147UNSAT 2.94955 2.98186
Sugar v1.13+minisat1038154UNSAT 3.12952 3.21372
Sugar v1.13+picosat1038153UNSAT 3.38448 3.46211
casper zao1043022UNSAT 4.01239 4.01725
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131038152UNSAT 4.87026 4.11211
galac E1038159UNSAT 5.2642 5.32677
casper zito1043651UNSAT 5.96009 5.96524
galac M1038158UNSAT 6.89595 15.5137
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301038146UNSAT 18.2542 18.29
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104350UNSAT 44.0343 44.5003
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301038145? (TO) 1800 1800.92
bpsolver 2008-06-271038155? (TO) 1800.04 1814.51
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301038144? (TO) 1800.07 1807.52

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: