CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/QCP-20/
normalized-qcp-20-187-10_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/QCP-20/
normalized-qcp-20-187-10_ext.xml
MD5SUMc75cabce312ab26d4e77e41ad2ea09be
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.80812
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables400
Number of constraints5540
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size20
Number of constraints which are defined in extension5540
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
galac E1037925UNSAT 5.80812 5.86896
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037920UNSAT 9.16461 9.23148
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037919UNSAT 9.76751 9.85453
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037918UNSAT 13.6039 13.7043
galac M1037924UNSAT 20.3489 20.5822
cpHydra k_101045525UNSAT 67.9327 69.3183
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037922UNSAT 88.7915 89.1895
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037923UNSAT 196.177 197.299
cpHydra k_401046154UNSAT 734.904 741.651
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037917? (TO) 1800.03 1819.01
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037911? (TO) 1800.03 1810.82
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037910? (TO) 1800.03 1808.92
Mistral-option 1.3141037926? (TO) 1800.06 1811.81
casper zito1043638? (TO) 1800.06 1800.91
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037912? (TO) 1800.06 1818.32
bpsolver 2008-06-271037921? (TO) 1800.07 1809.01
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037916? (TO) 1800.07 1812.01
casper zao1043009? (TO) 1800.08 1801.21
Abscon 112v4 AC1044267? (TO) 1800.09 1818.45
spider 2008-06-141037913? (TO) 1800.1 1805.03
Mistral-prime 1.3131037927? (TO) 1800.1 1807.21
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104337? (TO) 1800.12 1801.21
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044896? (TO) 1800.13 1809.65

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: