CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/langford/
normalized-langford-2-4-ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/langford/
normalized-langford-2-4-ext.xml
MD5SUM44ab68d9c3df9bda125b0db430afe12c
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.004998
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables8
Number of constraints32
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size8
Number of constraints which are defined in extension32
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-option 1.3141037638SAT 0.004998 0.01299
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037629SAT 0.005998 0.012742
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037628SAT 0.007998 0.013772
Mistral-prime 1.3131037639SAT 0.007998 0.0131081
spider 2008-06-141037625SAT 0.008998 0.017339
casper zao1042993SAT 0.010997 0.0192401
casper zito1043622SAT 0.010998 0.0168139
cpHydra k_101045509SAT 0.016997 0.0243659
cpHydra k_401046138SAT 0.017996 0.024157
bpsolver 2008-06-271037633SAT 0.028995 0.035318
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104321SAT 0.273957 0.335885
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037624SAT 0.314951 0.375818
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037622SAT 0.32395 0.347353
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037623SAT 0.32495 0.373856
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037635SAT 0.394939 0.425355
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037634SAT 0.411936 0.426619
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037631SAT 0.498923 0.539529
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037632SAT 0.502922 0.595075
Abscon 112v4 AC1044251SAT 0.668897 0.731585
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044880SAT 0.703892 0.734991
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037630SAT 0.714891 0.771169
galac E1037637SAT 0.808876 0.891641
galac M1037636SAT 0.811876 0.855522

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
1 4 2 0 3 7 6 5