CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/BH-4-4/
normalized-BlackHole-4-4-e-0_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/BH-4-4/
normalized-BlackHole-4-4-e-0_ext.xml
MD5SUM78fd2e0579ed1e222d3ce17f5c52a213
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.015996
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables64
Number of constraints431
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size16
Number of constraints which are defined in extension431
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Mistral-prime 1.3131037405UNSAT 0.015996 0.0235701
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271037395UNSAT 0.017997 0.0218301
MDG-probe 2008-06-271037394UNSAT 0.017997 0.017679
Mistral-option 1.3141037404UNSAT 0.019996 0.0287299
cpHydra k_101045496UNSAT 0.029995 0.035845
cpHydra k_401046125UNSAT 0.029995 0.0332519
bpsolver 2008-06-271037399UNSAT 0.069988 0.0703119
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261037401UNSAT 0.549916 0.575206
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261037400UNSAT 0.597908 0.627826
Abscon 112v4 AC1044238UNSAT 0.776881 0.833499
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044867UNSAT 0.839872 0.897638
Sugar v1.13+minisat1037398UNSAT 1.05684 1.17849
galac E1037403UNSAT 1.23481 1.27707
Sugar v1.13+picosat1037397UNSAT 1.3108 1.44272
galac M1037402UNSAT 1.39979 1.45485
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301037390UNSAT 1.71774 1.77151
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131037396UNSAT 1.9397 1.92071
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104308UNSAT 2.52661 2.56829
casper zito1043609UNSAT 2.78058 2.80775
casper zao1042980UNSAT 5.10222 5.1045
spider 2008-06-141037391UNSAT 420.986 421.357
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301037389? (TO) 1800.01 1801.42
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301037388? (TO) 1800.01 1807.72

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: