CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-27/
normalized-rand-27-27-351-163-60021_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-27/
normalized-rand-27-27-351-163-60021_ext.xml
MD5SUM3fac0267769b5685d0439ad78a5552c1
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark154.041
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables27
Number of constraints351
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size27
Number of constraints which are defined in extension351
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044739SAT 154.041 153.959
Abscon 112v4 AC1044110SAT 159.193 159.374
cpHydra k_401045997SAT 165.254 167.837
Mistral-option 1.3141035100SAT 350.568 350.967
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301035084SAT 354.708 357.952
MDG-probe 2008-06-271035090SAT 425.577 427.24
bpsolver 2008-06-271035095SAT 534.268 537.01
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271035091SAT 648.661 648.919
cpHydra k_101045368SAT 714.927 716.165
Mistral-prime 1.3131035101SAT 722.034 723.873
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301035086SAT 1583.98 1585.61
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301035085? (TO) 1800.01 1803.52
casper zao1042852? (TO) 1800.01 1815.01
galac M1035098? (TO) 1800.03 1816.41
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104180? (TO) 1800.04 1810.51
galac E1035099? (TO) 1800.04 1814.92
Sugar v1.13+minisat1035094? (TO) 1800.06 1816.92
spider 2008-06-141035087? (TO) 1800.06 1803.31
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131035092? (TO) 1800.07 1810.26
Sugar v1.13+picosat1035093? (TO) 1800.08 1801.22
casper zito1043481? (TO) 1800.1 1800.81
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261035097? (TO) 1800.14 1805.66
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261035096? (TO) 1800.14 1808.96

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found:
12 8 8 11 24 23 5 3 5 2 5 15 22 19 12 19 24 26 0 9 6 7 3 25 0 18 6