CSP 2008 Competition: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
csp/rand-2-24/
normalized-rand-24-24-276-139-54021_ext.xml

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Namecsp/rand-2-24/
normalized-rand-24-24-276-139-54021_ext.xml
MD5SUM03181f34bef1168c4867222722763e4f
Bench Category2-ARY-EXT (binary constraints in extension)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkUNSAT
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark49.4715
Satisfiable
(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Number of variables24
Number of constraints276
Maximum constraint arity2
Maximum domain size24
Number of constraints which are defined in extension276
Number of constraints which are defined in intension0
Global constraints used (with number of constraints)

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
bpsolver 2008-06-271034843UNSAT 49.4715 49.898
Mistral-prime 1.3131034849UNSAT 85.9809 86.3882
MDG-noprobe 2008-06-271034839UNSAT 86.5758 86.9224
MDG-probe 2008-06-271034838UNSAT 88.4765 88.8488
cpHydra k_101045354UNSAT 93.5988 94.9379
Mistral-option 1.3141034848UNSAT 95.2985 96.0451
Abscon 112v4 ESAC1044725UNSAT 199.539 200.47
cpHydra k_401045983UNSAT 205.783 207.091
Abscon 112v4 AC1044096UNSAT 214.288 216.182
Concrete + CPS4J 2008-05-301034834UNSAT 270.818 273.187
choco2_impwdeg 2008-06-261034844UNSAT 332.651 334.91
choco2_dwdeg 2008-06-261034845UNSAT 344.414 346.893
casper zito1043467UNSAT 1133.42 1133.96
spider 2008-06-141034835UNSAT 1165.45 1167.73
galac M1034846? (TO) 1800.02 1802.72
galac E1034847? (TO) 1800.03 1800.81
Concrete + CSP4J - WMC Engine 2008-05-301034833? (TO) 1800.04 1800.92
casper zao1042838? (TO) 1800.04 1801.11
Sugar v1.13+minisat1034842? (TO) 1800.06 1816.42
SAT4J CSP 2008-06-131034840? (TO) 1800.07 1813.87
Sugar v1.13+picosat1034841? (TO) 1800.07 1815.72
Concrete + CSP4J - Tabu Engine 2008-05-301034832? (TO) 1800.07 1816.13
Minion/Tailor 2008-07-041104166? (TO) 1800.13 1809.51

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

Solution found: