PB'06 evaluation: results by benchmark

Results by benchmark for category optimisation, small integers (OPT-SMALLINT), subcategory Handmade, subsubcategory Queens Problems

This page displays the results of the different solvers for each benchmark for category optimisation, small integers (OPT-SMALLINT), subcategory Handmade, subsubcategory Queens Problems

REMINDER

Keep in mind that the 'Best result' columns only provide the best result given by one of the solvers. This 'Best result' may be wrong in case of an UNSATISFIABLE or OPTIMUM FOUND answer (because there's no efficient way to check these answers).

Description of a cell contents:

Cell exampleMeaning
AnswerSolver result
f=...value of the objective function for the model reported by the solver
TT=...Total Time (TT): this is the CPU time (in seconds) used by the solver until termination. This time is only meaningful for complete solvers because incomplete solvers will always run until they time out
T1=...Time to get the best model (T1): this is the wall clock time (in seconds) ellapsed when the solver found its best model. This time is obtained from the 'o lines'. It is useful to compare both complete and incomplete solvers. It doesn't take into account the time to prove optimality of the solution.
Remember that CPU time and wall clock time are two very different notions. The CPU time represents the time during which the instructions of the solver were executed by the processor. The wall clock time represents how much time ellapsed on the clock. For a same event, the CPU time may be either smaller or greater than the wall clock time depending on the number of threads of execution and the number of processors.

Meaning of some abbreviations:

AbbreviationMeaning
f=...Value of the objective function
TOTime Out
MOMem. Out (out of memory)

Meaning of the different colors:

ColorMeaning
textthe solver cannot handle this instance
textthe solver gave no answer
textthe solver could give an answer (SAT)
textthe solver gave a definitive answer (OPTIMUM FOUND or UNSAT)
textthe solver performed better than the other ones on that instance (complete solvers point of view)
textthe solver performed better than the other ones on that instance (incomplete solvers point of view)
textthe solver was ended by a signal or other problem
textthe solver gave an incomplete answer
textthe solver gave a wrong answer

For better readability, you may choose to hide some solvers:
absconPseudo 1
bsolo 2006/05
glpPB 0.2
minisat+ 1.14
PBS 4.1L
PB-smodels 1.28
PB-smodels 1.31
Pueblo 1.3
Pueblo 1.4
SAT4JPSEUDO 2006.2
SAT4JPSEUDO 2006.2 Heuristics
wildcat-rnp 0.8.0
wildcat-skc 0.8.0

Bench nameBest results
on this
instance
absconPseudo
1
bsolo
2006/05
glpPB
0.2
minisat+
1.14
PBS
4.1L
PB-smodels
1.28
PB-smodels
1.31
Pueblo
1.3
Pueblo
1.4
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2 Heuristics
wildcat-rnp
0.8.0
wildcat-skc
0.8.0
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_0.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=449
TT=1800.76
T1=946.62
? (TO)

TT=1801.74

SAT (TO)
f=9422
TT=1800.77
T1=65.71
? (TO)

TT=1800.68

SAT (TO)
f=5555
TT=1800.9
T1=943.91
? (TO)

TT=1800.53

? (TO)

TT=1800.58

? (TO)

TT=1800.37

Signal

TT=1466.84

Signal

TT=1480.57

? (TO)

TT=1800.68

? (TO)

TT=1800.42

SAT (TO)
f=449
TT=1800.76
T1=946.62
SAT (TO)
f=531
TT=1800.67
T1=1448.48
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_10.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=489
TT=1800.66
T1=1551.09
? (TO)

TT=1801.62

SAT (TO)
f=9218
TT=1800.6
T1=66.74
? (TO)

TT=1800.79

SAT (TO)
f=5911
TT=1800.61
T1=1274.52
? (TO)

TT=1800.6

? (TO)

TT=1800.99

? (TO)

TT=1800.59

Signal

TT=1538.94

Signal

TT=1555.1

? (TO)

TT=1800.69

? (TO)

TT=1800.73

SAT (TO)
f=489
TT=1800.66
T1=1551.09
SAT (TO)
f=550
TT=1800.69
T1=554.02
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_11.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=487
TT=1800.7
T1=689.78
? (TO)

TT=1801.97

SAT (TO)
f=8692
TT=1800.72
T1=66.93
? (TO)

TT=1800.68

SAT (TO)
f=4683
TT=1800.67
T1=1147.74
? (TO)

TT=1800.66

? (TO)

TT=1800.57

? (TO)

TT=1800.58

Signal

TT=1585.45

Signal

TT=1597.98

? (TO)

TT=1800.89

? (TO)

TT=1800.2

SAT (TO)
f=487
TT=1800.7
T1=689.78
SAT (TO)
f=634
TT=1800.56
T1=1748.16
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_12.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=441
TT=1800.6
T1=1648.59
? (TO)

TT=1801.58

SAT (TO)
f=9276
TT=1800.49
T1=66.04
? (TO)

TT=1800.7

SAT (TO)
f=5733
TT=1800.82
T1=1703.39
? (TO)

TT=1800.46

? (TO)

TT=1800.69

? (TO)

TT=1800.26

Signal

TT=1525.61

Signal

TT=1455.31

? (TO)

TT=1800.5

? (TO)

TT=1801.07

SAT (TO)
f=441
TT=1800.6
T1=1648.59
SAT (TO)
f=557
TT=1800.63
T1=1507.86
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_13.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=448
TT=1800.53
T1=1315.63
? (TO)

TT=1801.83

SAT (TO)
f=9170
TT=1800.54
T1=66.66
? (TO)

TT=1800.76

SAT (TO)
f=5270
TT=1800.81
T1=1523.38
? (TO)

TT=1800.59

? (TO)

TT=1800.45

? (TO)

TT=1800.69

Signal

TT=1600.67

Signal

TT=1606.09

? (TO)

TT=1800.9

? (TO)

TT=1800.99

SAT (TO)
f=448
TT=1800.53
T1=1315.63
SAT (TO)
f=488
TT=1800.57
T1=1651.16
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_14.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=505
TT=1800.51
T1=1488.37
? (TO)

TT=1801.9

SAT (TO)
f=10250
TT=1800.41
T1=66.33
? (TO)

TT=1800.69

SAT (TO)
f=5675
TT=1800.8
T1=778.2
? (TO)

TT=1800.79

? (TO)

TT=1800.75

? (TO)

TT=1800.32

Signal

TT=1429.22

Signal

TT=1445.51

? (TO)

TT=1800.63

? (TO)

TT=1801.06

SAT (TO)
f=505
TT=1800.51
T1=1488.37
SAT (TO)
f=661
TT=1800.69
T1=1662.97
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_1.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=414
TT=1800.71
T1=1771.13
? (TO)

TT=1801.4

SAT (TO)
f=8709
TT=1800.54
T1=67.28
? (TO)

TT=1800.79

Signal

TT=1678.47

? (TO)

TT=1800.47

? (TO)

TT=1800.34

? (TO)

TT=1800.73

Signal

TT=1548.45

Signal

TT=1559.77

? (TO)

TT=1800.59

? (TO)

TT=1800.75

SAT (TO)
f=414
TT=1800.71
T1=1771.13
SAT (TO)
f=500
TT=1800.63
T1=1748.4
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_2.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=469
TT=1800.68
T1=1431.98
? (TO)

TT=1801.76

SAT (TO)
f=9347
TT=1800.69
T1=66.74
? (TO)

TT=1800.75

Signal

TT=1775.74

? (TO)

TT=1800.65

? (TO)

TT=1800.46

? (TO)

TT=1800.45

Signal

TT=1768.17

Signal

TT=1666.58

? (TO)

TT=1800.64

? (TO)

TT=1800.33

SAT (TO)
f=469
TT=1800.68
T1=1431.98
SAT (TO)
f=611
TT=1800.7
T1=1153.18
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_3.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=489
TT=1800.64
T1=1550.64
? (TO)

TT=1801.59

SAT (TO)
f=9411
TT=1800.76
T1=65.85
? (TO)

TT=1800.78

SAT (TO)
f=5681
TT=1800.97
T1=476.63
? (TO)

TT=1800.15

? (TO)

TT=1800.28

? (TO)

TT=1800.75

Signal

TT=1659.21

Signal

TT=1767

? (TO)

TT=1800.91

? (TO)

TT=1800.73

SAT (TO)
f=489
TT=1800.64
T1=1550.64
SAT (TO)
f=564
TT=1800.64
T1=1583.32
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_4.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=477
TT=1800.69
T1=1426.06
? (TO)

TT=1801.68

SAT (TO)
f=9254
TT=1800.64
T1=66.21
? (TO)

TT=1800.57

SAT (TO)
f=5674
TT=1800.95
T1=1643.53
? (TO)

TT=1800.64

? (TO)

TT=1800.54

? (TO)

TT=1800.41

Signal

TT=1741.67

Signal

TT=1754.79

? (TO)

TT=1800.57

? (TO)

TT=1800.25

SAT (TO)
f=477
TT=1800.69
T1=1426.06
SAT (TO)
f=638
TT=1800.71
T1=1663.26
Bench nameBest results
on this
instance
absconPseudo
1
bsolo
2006/05
glpPB
0.2
minisat+
1.14
PBS
4.1L
PB-smodels
1.28
PB-smodels
1.31
Pueblo
1.3
Pueblo
1.4
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2 Heuristics
wildcat-rnp
0.8.0
wildcat-skc
0.8.0
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_5.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=485
TT=1800.65
T1=1594.52
? (TO)

TT=1801.49

SAT (TO)
f=10118
TT=1800.67
T1=65
? (TO)

TT=1800.59

Signal

TT=1624.42

? (TO)

TT=1800.64

? (TO)

TT=1800.28

? (TO)

TT=1800.45

Signal

TT=1543.93

Signal

TT=1558.22

? (TO)

TT=1800.57

? (TO)

TT=1800.63

SAT (TO)
f=485
TT=1800.65
T1=1594.52
SAT (TO)
f=549
TT=1800.55
T1=1468.03
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_6.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=462
TT=1800.86
T1=1661.68
? (TO)

TT=1801.78

SAT (TO)
f=8999
TT=1800.72
T1=66.46
? (TO)

TT=1800.7

SAT (TO)
f=6062
TT=1800.77
T1=867.11
? (TO)

TT=1800.57

? (TO)

TT=1800.32

? (TO)

TT=1800.45

Signal

TT=1585.47

Signal

TT=1596.8

? (TO)

TT=1800.83

? (TO)

TT=1801

SAT (TO)
f=462
TT=1800.86
T1=1661.68
SAT (TO)
f=554
TT=1800.61
T1=1327.55
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_7.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=469
TT=1800.72
T1=1007
? (TO)

TT=1801.95

SAT (TO)
f=9116
TT=1800.63
T1=65.83
? (TO)

TT=1800.75

SAT (TO)
f=5350
TT=1800.77
T1=1239.38
? (TO)

TT=1800.5

? (TO)

TT=1800.41

? (TO)

TT=1800.97

Signal

TT=1525.01

Signal

TT=1531.36

? (TO)

TT=1800.51

? (TO)

TT=1800.73

SAT (TO)
f=469
TT=1800.72
T1=1007
SAT (TO)
f=531
TT=1800.57
T1=1701.7
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_8.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=371
TT=1800.75
T1=1201.09
? (TO)

TT=1801.6

SAT (TO)
f=8848
TT=1800.64
T1=66.05
? (TO)

TT=1800.68

Signal

TT=1597.98

? (TO)

TT=1800.57

? (TO)

TT=1800.2

? (TO)

TT=1800.64

SAT
f=5545
TT=1783.01
T1=1323.01
SAT
f=5545
TT=1782.98
T1=1327.47
? (TO)

TT=1801.03

? (TO)

TT=1800.55

SAT (TO)
f=371
TT=1800.75
T1=1201.09
SAT (TO)
f=415
TT=1800.67
T1=665.5
normalized-PB06/OPT-SMALLINT/
submitted-PB06/liu/wnq/
normalized-wnq_n100_mw99_9.opb.PB06.opb
SAT
f=447
TT=1800.6
T1=1218.18
? (TO)

TT=1801.64

SAT (TO)
f=9552
TT=1800.83
T1=65.92
? (TO)

TT=1800.53

SAT (TO)
f=5012
TT=1800.78
T1=928.15
? (TO)

TT=1800.56

? (TO)

TT=1800.48

? (TO)

TT=1800.38

Signal

TT=1520.84

Signal

TT=1535.68

? (TO)

TT=1801.02

? (TO)

TT=1801.05

SAT (TO)
f=447
TT=1800.6
T1=1218.18
SAT (TO)
f=616
TT=1800.71
T1=1580.67

Some statistics...

absconPseudo
1
bsolo
2006/05
glpPB
0.2
minisat+
1.14
PBS
4.1L
PB-smodels
1.28
PB-smodels
1.31
Pueblo
1.3
Pueblo
1.4
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2
SAT4JPSEUDO
2006.2 Heuristics
wildcat-rnp
0.8.0
wildcat-skc
0.8.0
Number of times the solver is able to give the best known answer00000000000150
Number of times the solver is able to give the best known answer from an incomplete solver point of view (i.e. without considering optimality proof)00000000000150
Number of times the solver is the best solver from a complete solver point of view (i.e. best known answer and best TT time)00000000000150
Number of times the solver is the best solver from an incomplete solver point of view (i.e. best known answer and best T1 time)00000000000150