@InProceedings{CKM+-13-2,
title = {On the Revision of Argumentation Systems: Minimal Change of Arguments Status},
booktitle = {2nd International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation(TAFA'13)},
author = {Coste-Marquis, Sylvie and Konieczny, Sébastien and Mailly, Jean-Guy and Marquis, Pierre},
year = {2013},
month = {aug},
address = {Beijing},
note = {workshop at IJCAI'13},
abstract = {In this paper, we investigate the revision issue for argumentation systems à la Dung. We focus on revision as minimal change of the arguments status. Contrarily to most of the previous works on the topic, the addition of new arguments is not allowed in the revision process, so that the revised system has to be obtained by modifying the attack relation, only. We introduce a language of revision formulae which is expressive enough for enabling the representation of complex conditions on the acceptability of arguments in the revised system. We show how AGM belief revision postulates can be translated to the case of argumentation systems. We provide a corresponding representation theorem in terms of minimal change of the arguments status. Several distance-based revision operators satisfying the postulates are also pointed out.},
}