This page presents the ranking of the different solvers. Solvers are ranked on the number of solved instances. Ties are broken by considering the minimum total solution time.
Solvers which gave a wrong answer in a category are excluded from the ranking in that category.
The Virtual Best Solver (VBS) is a theoretical construction which returns the best answer provided by one of the submitted solver. It corresponds to the 'Best result' column in the bench per bench view of the results. It can be considered as a meta solver which uses a perfect oracle to guess instantaneously which of the submitted solver will be the most efficient to solve the instance. Another way to look at it is to consider this VBS as a solver which would run all other solvers in parallel, bringing together all the solvers strenghs. This VBS is essentially the same notion as State Of The Art (SOTA) solver defined in "Evaluating general purpose automated theorem proving systems", Artificial Intelligence, Volume 131, Issues 1-2, September 2001, Pages 39-54 Geoff Sutcliffe, Christian Suttner. However, SOTA is a more general notion: the VBS can be seen as the least powerful SOTA solver.
| Rank | Solver | Version | Number of solved instances | Detail | % of all instances | % of VBS | Cumulated CPU time on solved instances | Average CPU time per solved instance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of instances in the category: 292 | ||||||||
| Virtual Best Solver (VBS) | 193 | 74 SAT, 119 UNSAT | 66% | 100% | 97433.92 | 504.84 | ||
| 1 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 1/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 187 | 68 SAT, 119 UNSAT | 64% | 97% | 112384.15 | 600.98 |
| 2 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 0/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 185 | 69 SAT, 116 UNSAT | 63% | 96% | 103255.01 | 558.14 |
| 3 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 2/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 181 | 65 SAT, 116 UNSAT | 62% | 94% | 104021.63 | 574.71 |
| 4 | satake | 2009-03-22 (4 threads) | 118 | 52 SAT, 66 UNSAT | 40% | 61% | 50543.61 | 428.34 |
| 5 | satake | 2009-03-22 (16 threads) | 106 | 40 SAT, 66 UNSAT | 36% | 55% | 130477.38 | 1230.92 |
| 6 | ttsth-5-0 | 2009-03-19 (4 threads) | 7 | 3 SAT, 4 UNSAT | 2% | 4% | 2274.38 | 324.91 |
| 7 | ttsth-5-0 | 2009-03-19 (16 threads) | 7 | 3 SAT, 4 UNSAT | 2% | 4% | 9007.53 | 1286.79 |
| Rank | Solver | Version | Number of solved instances | % of all instances | % of VBS | Cumulated CPU time on solved instances | Average CPU time per solved instance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of instances in the category: 292 | |||||||
| Virtual Best Solver (VBS) | 74 | 25% | 100% | 33645.26 | 454.67 | ||
| 1 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 0/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 69 | 24% | 93% | 34114.05 | 494.41 |
| 2 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 1/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 68 | 23% | 92% | 41487.79 | 610.11 |
| 3 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 2/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 65 | 22% | 88% | 34639.99 | 532.92 |
| 4 | satake | 2009-03-22 (4 threads) | 52 | 18% | 70% | 19984.15 | 384.31 |
| 5 | satake | 2009-03-22 (16 threads) | 40 | 14% | 54% | 46075.72 | 1151.89 |
| 6 | ttsth-5-0 | 2009-03-19 (4 threads) | 3 | 1% | 4% | 2195.38 | 731.79 |
| 7 | ttsth-5-0 | 2009-03-19 (16 threads) | 3 | 1% | 4% | 8952.74 | 2984.25 |
| Rank | Solver | Version | Number of solved instances | % of all instances | % of VBS | Cumulated CPU time on solved instances | Average CPU time per solved instance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of instances in the category: 292 | |||||||
| Virtual Best Solver (VBS) | 119 | 41% | 100% | 63788.66 | 536.04 | ||
| 1 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 1/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 119 | 41% | 100% | 70896.36 | 595.77 |
| 2 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 0/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 116 | 40% | 97% | 69140.96 | 596.04 |
| 3 | ManySAT 1.1 | aimd 2/2009-03-20 (4 threads) | 116 | 40% | 97% | 69381.64 | 598.12 |
| 4 | satake | 2009-03-22 (4 threads) | 66 | 23% | 55% | 30559.46 | 463.02 |
| 5 | satake | 2009-03-22 (16 threads) | 66 | 23% | 55% | 84401.66 | 1278.81 |
| 6 | ttsth-5-0 | 2009-03-19 (16 threads) | 4 | 1% | 3% | 54.79 | 13.70 |
| 7 | ttsth-5-0 | 2009-03-19 (4 threads) | 4 | 1% | 3% | 79.00 | 19.75 |
| Rank | Solver | Version | Number of solved instances | Detail | % of all instances | % of VBS | Cumulated CPU time on solved instances | Average CPU time per solved instance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of instances in the category: 570 | ||||||||
| Virtual Best Solver (VBS) | 297 | 297 SAT | 52% | 100% | 99556.61 | 335.21 | ||
| 1 | gNovelty+-T | 2009-03-22 (4 threads) | 296 | 296 SAT | 52% | 100% | 95118.33 | 321.35 |
| 2 | gNovelty+-T | 2009-03-22 (16 threads) | 237 | 237 SAT | 42% | 80% | 68173.49 | 287.65 |
| Rank | Solver | Version | Number of solved instances | % of all instances | % of VBS | Cumulated CPU time on solved instances | Average CPU time per solved instance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of instances in the category: 570 | |||||||
| Virtual Best Solver (VBS) | 297 | 52% | 100% | 99556.61 | 335.21 | ||
| 1 | gNovelty+-T | 2009-03-22 (4 threads) | 296 | 52% | 100% | 95118.33 | 321.35 |
| 2 | gNovelty+-T | 2009-03-22 (16 threads) | 237 | 42% | 80% | 68173.49 | 287.65 |
| Rank | Solver | Version | Number of solved instances | % of all instances | % of VBS | Cumulated CPU time on solved instances | Average CPU time per solved instance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of instances in the category: 570 | |||||||
| Virtual Best Solver (VBS) | 0 | 0% | - | 0.00 | - | ||
| 1 | gNovelty+-T | 2009-03-22 (4 threads) | 0 | 0% | - | 0.00 | - |
| 2 | gNovelty+-T | 2009-03-22 (16 threads) | 0 | 0% | - | 0.00 | - |