PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/pedigree/
normalized-sheep4r-4-2_wcsp.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/pedigree/
normalized-sheep4r-4-2_wcsp.wbo
MD5SUM4279ee44886a475273bf158c4a05b4f8
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark47.8277
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables22540
Total number of constraints1101088
Number of soft constraints1098834
Number of constraints which are clauses1098834
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)2254
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints0
Minimum length of a constraint1
Maximum length of a constraint10
Top cost 899
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 899
Sum of constraints costs 980594130
Biggest number in a constraint 2
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 2
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 11
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers4
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090437OPTIMUM 15.7336 11.9134
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091823OPTIMUM 37.1584 23.9042
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094595OPTIMUM 47.8277 47.8345
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093209? (TO) 1800.38 1800.66

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
--too large--