PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/SOFT-BIGINT-LIN/PB10/oliveras/j90/
normalized-j9028_2-unsat--soft-0-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/SOFT-BIGINT-LIN/PB10/oliveras/j90/
normalized-j9028_2-unsat--soft-0-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM4d1c58660c75ed95d3f2b5267338b439
Bench CategorySOFT-BIGINT-LIN (only soft constraints, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark8
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark2.38364
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables13832
Total number of constraints45398
Number of soft constraints45398
Number of constraints which are clauses45098
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)0
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints300
Minimum length of a constraint1
Maximum length of a constraint73
Top cost 2287724
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 2287723
Biggest number in a constraint 68
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 7
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 479
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers9
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090845OPTIMUM 2.38364 1.12731
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4092231OPTIMUM 4.39533 2.38656
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093617OPTIMUM 35.4436 35.4565
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4095003MSAT (MO) 100.209 101.885

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 8
Solution found:
--too large--