PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900567985--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900567985--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMd52b3728da19986b004dc30001a23e20
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark54.1848
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints904
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 44120
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 44119
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 669
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4110004OPTIMUM 31.4882 29.7893
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4110005OPTIMUM 41.9066 27.6473
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4110007OPTIMUM 54.1848 54.193
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4110006OPTIMUM 556.455 556.676

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 x4 -x5 -x6 x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
x160 -x161 -x162 x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182 -x183
-x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205 -x206
-x207 -x208 x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228 -x229 -x230
-x231