PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900553812--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900553812--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMfa52148d69071c7fece24d526a14d5b1
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark3
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark17.2214
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints906
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 44801
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 44800
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 723
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109992OPTIMUM 13.5929 11.5633
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109995OPTIMUM 17.2214 17.2242
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109993OPTIMUM 18.1202 26.1497
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109994OPTIMUM 18.5992 18.6042

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 3
Solution found:
-x1 x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 x228
-x229 -x230 -x231