PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900557362--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900557362--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM908c51b3c7715396d94712713af78fd9
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark5
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark55.5386
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1868
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 94981
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 94980
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 709
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090566OPTIMUM 37.3683 35.7925
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094724OPTIMUM 55.5386 55.5482
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091952OPTIMUM 62.5325 62.0121
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093338OPTIMUM 115.67 115.689

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 5
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 x18 -x19 -x20 x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227
-x228 -x229 -x230 x231