PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900563801--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900563801--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM8222df718f0c39737e94bfab6b6fa003
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark5
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark13.341
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints927
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45360
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45359
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 719
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109954OPTIMUM 13.341 13.3424
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109952OPTIMUM 16.9304 15.0616
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109953OPTIMUM 18.6322 25.1345
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109955OPTIMUM 31.9891 31.9948

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 5
Solution found:
-x231