PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900552735--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900552735--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMfc51ff1d1c737b59f1aece9b373640d1
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark6
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark30.2364
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints906
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 44801
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 44800
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 739
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109909OPTIMUM 27.2189 32.1917
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109911OPTIMUM 30.2364 30.2417
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109908OPTIMUM 35.59 33.9513
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109910OPTIMUM 42.0596 42.0678

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 6
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 x181 -x182 x183
-x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 x205 -x206
-x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228 -x229
-x230 -x231