PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900581320--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900581320--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM8591b35e74198f55af565a685d4a35ec
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark51.3322
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1837
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 93832
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 93831
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 641
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091968OPTIMUM 18.1502 24.2768
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090582OPTIMUM 26.8599 25.6438
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094740OPTIMUM 51.3322 51.3402
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093354OPTIMUM 99.1349 99.1513

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231