PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900559676--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900559676--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM88fe2d235d496f5582f591254b27e0dd
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark63.8343
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1868
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 94981
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 94980
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 625
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109873OPTIMUM 37.3283 38.2935
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109875OPTIMUM 63.8343 63.8448
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109872OPTIMUM 74.83 73.0065
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109874OPTIMUM 222.736 222.773

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58 x59
-x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86 -x87
-x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 x112 -x113
-x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 x159 -x160
-x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182 x183 -x184
-x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 x204 -x205 -x206 -x207
-x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228 -x229 -x230
-x231