PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900544484--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900544484--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM9807244e443328f735b38c92df34bd91
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark24.0073
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints961
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 46411
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 46410
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 741
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109848OPTIMUM 16.1505 14.5344
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109850OPTIMUM 24.0073 24.0118
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109851OPTIMUM 25.6611 25.6653
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109849OPTIMUM 31.9181 42.2923

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 x228 -x229
-x230 -x231