PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900670234--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900670234--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM20db9b5796300dda9a6b98219b888af4
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark111.329
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints911
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 46278
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 46277
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 641
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109829OPTIMUM 46.5949 40.7199
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109828OPTIMUM 101.628 100.493
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109831OPTIMUM 111.329 111.347
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109830OPTIMUM 140.284 140.311

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58 x59
-x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86 -x87
-x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 x110 -x111 -x112 x113
-x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 x133 -x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 x227 -x228 -x229
-x230 -x231