PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900547389--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900547389--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM992c28e15fa8da7f001d610f6b39cc4c
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark52.9929
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints927
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45360
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45359
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 721
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109824OPTIMUM 52.63 50.8627
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109827OPTIMUM 52.9929 53.0027
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109826OPTIMUM 59.5149 59.5258
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109825MSAT (TO) 1800.05 1763.75

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 x5 -x6 -x7 x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 x56 -x57 -x58 -x59
-x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86 -x87
-x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231