PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900557574--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900557574--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM5ae7a85bf99e064da8ccbcbd4c939a34
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark9
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark44.2653
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints900
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45741
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45740
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 689
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109808OPTIMUM 29.6695 28.5488
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109811OPTIMUM 44.2653 44.2774
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109809OPTIMUM 55.7755 45.3857
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109810OPTIMUM 136.194 136.217

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 9
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 x15 -x16 -x17 x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 x66 x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 x139 -x140 -x141 x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 x226 -x227
-x228 -x229 -x230 -x231