PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900554420--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900554420--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM2c7bc414eea5148dc6372ccd38f2fe74
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark33.5569
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1863
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 94064
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 94063
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 689
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090564OPTIMUM 17.91 16.2071
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094722OPTIMUM 33.5569 33.5619
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091950OPTIMUM 35.3896 32.9669
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093336OPTIMUM 58.2531 58.2657

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 x58 -x59
-x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 x83 -x84 -x85 -x86 -x87
-x88 x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 x112 -x113
-x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205 x206
-x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228 -x229
-x230 x231