PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900576927--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900576927--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMfe999950861349ecbc6e2ee50c3d0e04
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark41.2697
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints911
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 45526
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 45525
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 671
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109740OPTIMUM 21.4197 20.2132
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109741OPTIMUM 25.3821 27.1197
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109743OPTIMUM 41.2697 41.2767
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109742OPTIMUM 312.009 312.094

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 x55 -x56 -x57 -x58 x59
-x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86 -x87
-x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 x112 -x113
-x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 -x136
-x137 x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182 -x183
-x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205 x206
-x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228 -x229
-x230 -x231