PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900569834--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900569834--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM9b675eaf583b613075d5327645ad3a71
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark8
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark89.0185
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1863
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 94064
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 94063
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 723
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109724OPTIMUM 60.13 58.9504
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109727OPTIMUM 89.0185 89.0337
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109725OPTIMUM 124.645 85.3961
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109726OPTIMUM 268.249 268.312

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 8
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 x9 -x10 -x11 x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227
-x228 x229 -x230 -x231