PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900553647--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900553647--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM187986d7f99d984dce20251cf704622a
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark28.6146
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints911
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 46278
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 46277
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 715
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109717OPTIMUM 18.6912 25.6855
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109719OPTIMUM 28.6146 28.619
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109716OPTIMUM 43.6084 41.7984
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109718OPTIMUM 135.091 135.131

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231