PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900670675--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900670675--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM1266a85a20696deb0d7aee67f4c2d0a0
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark18.9021
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1802
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 91108
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 91107
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 671
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090588OPTIMUM 14.9627 13.5138
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093360OPTIMUM 18.9021 18.9067
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094746OPTIMUM 26.233 26.239
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091974MSAT (TO) 1800.85 1786.15

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181
-x182 -x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 x190 -x191 -x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 x201 -x202 -x203 -x204
-x205 -x206 -x207 x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 x219 -x220 -x221 x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231