PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900554072--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900554072--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM94413eaf3e98de59f2ecdb125fc71636
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark3
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark32.927
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints961
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 46411
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 46410
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 695
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109684OPTIMUM 22.56 20.3113
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109686OPTIMUM 32.927 32.9337
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109687OPTIMUM 41.7906 41.7986
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109685MSAT (TO) 1801.18 1780.91

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 3
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 -x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 -x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 -x225 -x226 -x227 -x228 x229
-x230 -x231