PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900568186--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/tsp/
normalized-t3002.11tsp11.1900568186--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM5d44b96125a480c7e8ae11943224729b
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark3
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark39.1191
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables231
Total number of constraints2707
Number of soft constraints1839
Number of constraints which are clauses2684
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)22
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint110
Top cost 91769
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 100
Sum of constraints costs 91768
Biggest number in a constraint 25
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 5
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 721
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers10
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109664OPTIMUM 30.0194 28.7206
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109667OPTIMUM 39.1191 39.1256
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109666OPTIMUM 52.1591 52.1765
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109665MSAT (TO) 1800.04 1771.64

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 3
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135 x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 x155 -x156 -x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 x167 -x168 -x169 -x170 -x171 -x172 -x173 -x174 -x175 -x176 -x177 x178 -x179 -x180 -x181 -x182
-x183 -x184 -x185 -x186 -x187 -x188 -x189 -x190 -x191 x192 -x193 -x194 -x195 -x196 -x197 -x198 -x199 -x200 -x201 -x202 -x203 x204 -x205
-x206 -x207 -x208 -x209 -x210 -x211 -x212 -x213 -x214 -x215 -x216 -x217 -x218 -x219 -x220 -x221 -x222 -x223 -x224 x225 -x226 -x227 -x228
-x229 -x230 -x231