PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110973163--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110973163--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMe7272fac9c266fd7ef88e48b4d5664ef
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark69
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark22.4036
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints26
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 1243
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 96
Sum of constraints costs 1242
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1215
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109612OPTIMUM 12.5911 11.6622
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109615OPTIMUM 22.4036 22.4088
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109613OPTIMUM 27.5488 26.6673
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109614OPTIMUM 57.3443 57.354

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 69
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111
-x112 -x113 -x114 -x115 x116 -x117 x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134
-x135 -x136 -x137 -x138 x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157
-x158 -x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 x169