PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111220546--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111220546--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM92e9d82ea45c04735bed18ced94c3392
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark3.39048
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints64
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 2925
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 96
Sum of constraints costs 2924
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1248
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094764OPTIMUM 3.39048 3.39203
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090606OPTIMUM 5.64314 4.50346
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091992OPTIMUM 14.3828 32.3486
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093378OPTIMUM 19.937 19.9435

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 x143 -x144 -x145 x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169