PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110978113--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110978113--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM9bf5159c7db1b1e3f0d68c452139be86
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark2
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.8981
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints64
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 3426
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 99
Sum of constraints costs 3425
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1184
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109471OPTIMUM 5.8981 5.89957
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109468OPTIMUM 10.5824 9.02211
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109469OPTIMUM 22.0017 27.8685
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109470OPTIMUM 22.3306 22.3377

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 2
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169