PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111218757--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1111218757--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM8ae5062c7652fddde3927693898a40dc
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark80
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark18.1402
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints28
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 1415
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 98
Sum of constraints costs 1414
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1266
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4090604OPTIMUM 12.1422 11.2183
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4094762OPTIMUM 18.1402 18.144
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4091990OPTIMUM 23.0995 32.0806
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4093376OPTIMUM 68.0686 68.0798

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 80
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 x135 -x136
-x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 x157 -x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169