PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110969170--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110969170--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUM6dd8afea921ee9eef16bd5f535a42450
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark14
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark10.6554
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints69
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 3204
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 97
Sum of constraints costs 3203
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1227
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109408OPTIMUM 10.1815 8.91517
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109411OPTIMUM 10.6554 10.6592
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109409OPTIMUM 28.1707 36.3786
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109410OPTIMUM 44.9192 44.935

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 14
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 -x63 -x64 x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 -x86
-x87 x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 x102 -x103 -x104 x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 x158 -x159
-x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 -x166 -x167 -x168 -x169