PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110970631--soft-33-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110970631--soft-33-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMe6f21b791cbec43296f2521eec73463c
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark19
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark10.1145
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints69
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 3204
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 97
Sum of constraints costs 3203
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1320
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109263OPTIMUM 10.1145 10.1173
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109260OPTIMUM 13.472 11.9453
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109261OPTIMUM 26.541 43.3593
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109262OPTIMUM 49.9964 50.0108

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 19
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 x25 -x26 x27 -x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 x43 -x44 -x45 -x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 x63 -x64 -x65 -x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 -x95 x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111 -x112
-x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 -x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134 -x135
-x136 -x137 -x138 -x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 x143 -x144 -x145 x146 -x147 -x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157 -x158
-x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 x166 -x167 -x168 -x169