PB'16 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110972154--soft-66-100-0.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN/PB06/submitted-PB06/namasivayam/wnqueen/
normalized-t2001.13queen13.1110972154--soft-66-100-0.wbo
MD5SUMeabed96e9c28cf15c9772fe79986c067
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-SMALLINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, small integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark66
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark5.04023
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables169
Total number of constraints101
Number of soft constraints28
Number of constraints which are clauses30
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)70
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints1
Minimum length of a constraint2
Maximum length of a constraint169
Top cost 1415
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 98
Sum of constraints costs 1414
Biggest number in a constraint 38
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 6
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 1221
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers11
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
NaPS 1.02 (complete)4109247OPTIMUM 5.04023 5.04211
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Resolution PB16 (complete)4109244OPTIMUM 15.3827 13.762
Sat4j PB 2.3.6 Res+CP PB16 (complete)4109245OPTIMUM 38.8671 36.2408
toysat 2016-05-02 (complete)4109246OPTIMUM 39.353 39.3595

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 66
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 -x3 -x4 -x5 -x6 -x7 -x8 -x9 -x10 -x11 -x12 x13 -x14 -x15 -x16 -x17 -x18 x19 -x20 -x21 -x22 -x23 -x24 -x25 -x26 -x27 x28 -x29 -x30
-x31 -x32 -x33 -x34 -x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 -x39 -x40 -x41 -x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 x46 -x47 -x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 -x54 -x55 -x56 -x57 -x58
-x59 -x60 -x61 -x62 x63 -x64 -x65 x66 -x67 -x68 -x69 -x70 -x71 -x72 -x73 -x74 -x75 -x76 -x77 -x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 -x82 -x83 -x84 -x85 x86
-x87 -x88 -x89 -x90 -x91 -x92 -x93 -x94 x95 -x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 -x100 -x101 -x102 -x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 -x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 -x111
-x112 x113 -x114 -x115 -x116 -x117 -x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 -x122 -x123 -x124 -x125 -x126 -x127 -x128 x129 -x130 -x131 -x132 -x133 -x134
-x135 -x136 -x137 -x138 x139 -x140 -x141 -x142 -x143 -x144 -x145 -x146 -x147 x148 -x149 -x150 -x151 -x152 -x153 -x154 -x155 -x156 -x157
-x158 -x159 -x160 -x161 -x162 -x163 -x164 -x165 x166 -x167 -x168 -x169