PB'10 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/depot/
normalized-depot01c_wcsp.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/depot/
normalized-depot01c_wcsp.wbo
MD5SUM19703bcbbfe663e698ae3419f5640730
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmarkMOPT
Best cost obtained on this benchmark1549
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark0.033994
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables173
Total number of constraints765
Number of soft constraints700
Number of constraints which are clauses700
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)65
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints0
Minimum length of a constraint1
Maximum length of a constraint5
Top cost 13672
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 13672
Sum of constraints costs 8981646
Biggest number in a constraint 1
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 1
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 6
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers3
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
PB/CT 0.1 fixed (complete)2701881OPTIMUM 0.033994 0.0338141
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.1 (complete)2701880OPTIMUM 0.435933 0.306243
PB/CT 0.1 (complete)2701879Wrong UNSAT 0.017996 0.0181929
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701876Wrong UNSAT 0.285956 0.253549
SAT4J PB CuttingPlanes 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701877Wrong UNSAT 0.295954 0.25576
SAT4J PB RES // CP 2.2.0 2010-05-31 (complete)2701878Wrong UNSAT 0.369942 1.2675

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints: 1549
Solution found:
-x1 -x2 x3 -x4 -x5 x6 -x7 x8 -x9 -x10 x11 x12 -x13 -x14 -x15 x16 -x17 x18 -x19 -x20 -x21 x22 -x23 -x24 x25 -x26 x27 -x28 -x29 -x30 -x31 -x32
x33 -x34 x35 -x36 -x37 -x38 x39 -x40 -x41 x42 -x43 -x44 -x45 x46 -x47 x48 -x49 -x50 -x51 -x52 -x53 x54 -x55 -x56 x57 x58 -x59 -x60 x61 -x62
x63 -x64 x65 -x66 x67 -x68 -x69 x70 x71 -x72 -x73 x74 x75 -x76 -x77 x78 -x79 -x80 -x81 x82 -x83 x84 -x85 -x86 -x87 -x88 x89 -x90 -x91 x92
-x93 -x94 -x95 x96 -x97 -x98 -x99 x100 -x101 -x102 x103 -x104 -x105 -x106 x107 -x108 -x109 -x110 x111 -x112 -x113 x114 -x115 -x116 x117
-x118 -x119 -x120 -x121 x122 x123 -x124 -x125 x126 -x127 -x128 x129 x130 -x131 x132 -x133 -x134 x135 -x136 x137 -x138 x139 x140 -x141 -x142
x143 x144 -x145 x146 -x147 x148 -x149 x150 -x151 x152 -x153 x154 -x155 -x156 x157 x158 -x159 x160 -x161 -x162 x163 x164 -x165 -x166 x167
x168 -x169 x170 -x171 -x172 x173