PB'10 competition: WBO track: solvers results per benchmarks

Result page for benchmark
/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/pedigree/
normalized-sheep4r_wcsp.wbo

Jump to solvers results

General information on the benchmark

Name/PARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN/wcsp/pedigree/
normalized-sheep4r_wcsp.wbo
MD5SUM6de6e540477f7e35d5e4504631857538
Bench CategoryPARTIAL-BIGINT-LIN (both soft and hard constraints, big integers, linear constraints)
Best result obtained on this benchmark
Best cost obtained on this benchmark
Best CPU time to get the best result obtained on this benchmark
Max-Satisfiable
Max-(Un)Satisfiability was proved
Best value of the cost
Optimality of the best cost was proved
Number of variables89200
Total number of constraints5870368
Number of soft constraints5861448
Number of constraints which are clauses5861448
Number of constraints which are cardinality constraints (but not clauses)8920
Number of constraints which are nor clauses,nor cardinality constraints0
Minimum length of a constraint1
Maximum length of a constraint10
Top cost 2447
Min constraint cost 1
Max constraint cost 2447
Sum of constraints costs 14289117012
Biggest number in a constraint 2
Number of bits of the biggest number in a constraint 2
Biggest sum of numbers in a constraint 11
Number of bits of the biggest sum of numbers4
Number of products (including duplicates)0
Sum of products size (including duplicates)0
Number of different products0
Sum of products size0

Results of the different solvers on this benchmark

Solver NameTraceIDAnswerCPU timeWall clock time
SAT4J PB CuttingPlanes 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701739? 150.51 126.064
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.1 (complete)2701742? 219.038 162.81
SAT4J PB RES // CP 2.2.0 2010-05-31 (complete)2701740? 346.173 313.139
SAT4J PB Resolution 2.2.0 2010-05-26 (complete)2701738? 1338.45 1294.65
PB/CT 0.1 fixed (complete)2701743? (MO) 55.4316 57.4312
PB/CT 0.1 (complete)2701741? (TO) 1800.08 1800.02

Additionnal information

This section presents information obtained from the best job displayed in the list (i.e. solvers whose names are not hidden).

cost of falsified constraints:
Solution found: